Saint Joseph's Atlanta  
Search
Home For Patients & Visitors For Physicians Career Opportunities Contact Us Directions
about
general_surgery
urology
heart
gynecology
robotic-surgery-for-physicians
contact_us_and_directions
Header Image
Home > Center for Robotic Surgery > urology > Abstract - Potency Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy...

Abstract - Potency Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy...

Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal AK. Potency Following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Questionnaire Based Analysis of Outcomes After Conventional Nerve Sparing and Prostatic Fascia Sparing Techniques. The Journal of Urology : Vol. 174, 2291–2296, December 2005. 

Purpose
Anatomical nerve sparing radical prostatectomy provides excellent cancer control, although the recovery of sexual function is variable. We recently described a technique to preserve the prostatic fascia (veil of Aphrodite) that appears to enhance the quality of nerve preservation during robotic prostatectomy. In January 2003 we initiated a prospective study comparing patients undergoing prostatic fascia preservation with those undergoing conventional nerve sparing robotic radical prostatectomy. We report results at 12 months of followup

Materials and Methods
From January to August 2003, 58 potent men with a Sexual Health Inventory for Men score (SHIM) of greater than 21 without phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors underwent Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, including 35 with preservation of the prostatic fascia (study) and 23 with conventional nerve sparing (control). Potency was assessed with self-administered SHIM questionnaires 12 months after surgery. The primary end point was achievement of erections strong enough for penetration with or without oral medications. The secondary end point was the ability to achieve normal erections (SHIM greater than 21) with and without medications.

Results
At 12 months of followup 17 of 23 control (74%) and 34 of 35 study (97%) patients achieved erections strong enough for intercourse (p = 0.002). Four control (17%) and 18 study (51%) patients achieved normal erections (SHIM greater than 21) without medication (p <0.0001). Six control (26%) and 30 study (86%) patients achieved normal erections with or without phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (p <0.0001).

Conclusions
Potency rates after radical prostatectomy vary with the measure used to define potency. Irrespective of the definition used patients undergoing prostatic fascia preserving radical prostatectomy have significantly better potency outcomes than patients undergoing conventional nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy at 12 months of followup.

Link to The Journal of Urology

For more information about robotic surgery, call 1-866-SJ-ROBOT (1-866-757-6268).

Related Physicians
 
Services
About robotic prostatectomy 
NVP procedure
Robotic surgery benefits
Expertise- Dr. Nikhil Shah
Treatment Options
Frequently asked questions
Robotic surgery testimonials
Clinical references
 
 
Doctors with this Specialty
Urology
 
Related Content
 

Tests and Procedures


 
Related Topics
 
 
Media Room | Mission | Privacy Policy | Corporate Compliance | Disclaimer | Site Map

Saint Joseph's Hospital • 5665 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, N.E. • Atlanta, Georgia 30342
678-843-7001